The first three levels of intimacy
named by Matthew Kelly in his book The
Seven Levels of Intimacy are clichés, facts, and opinions. For many of us a
good part of each day is spent in this shallow end of the intimacy pool.
Sometimes it is so shallow that we are only getting the soles of our feet wet.
Simple remarks that we aren’t really wanting a truthful response to are thrown
out there to those who cross our paths. “How are you today” is asked of a
receptionist while “I certainly hope he doesn’t tell me the truth” runs through
our head. The same clichéd greeting, with or without the internal dialogue
starts the conversation when we get home from work.
From the cliché level we move
easily into the facts level. The receptionist might respond, “I’m fine. What’s
the weather doing outside?” and we respond with a fact, “It’s snowing.” A few
more pleasantries follow and we bury our head in a magazine while we wait for
our name to be called. We might do the same thing to our partner when we get
home.
If we are feeling a bit more
daring with our partner we will venture into the opinions level. “It’s snowing”
might be followed by our opinion, “I don’t think you should drive to that
meeting tonight.” The opinion level is where most dialogue and depth of
intimacy ends. Why is that? Because it is where we begin to be vulnerable. We don’t
want to argue or look foolish.
So how would a conversation at
church look following this pattern? How about something like this – “Hey! How
are you this morning? I heard you were sick last week.” To which you would get
something like this – “Hey, great to be back. I’m good now that I’ve taken a
boat load of antibiotics. Thanks for asking!” So far so good, but there’s more.
“I don’t know if you have heard this yet but pastor didn’t wear her vestments
last week. She said it was too hot but I think she should wear them anyway –
it’s part of the job and she knew that when she went to seminary.” Oh boy, now
there’s a potential can of worms being opened. It can escalate quickly from
here. Imagine if this was a question of theology!
In my opinion, this is where the
point of disillusionment can rest most heavily. If you are in a relationship
that goes to more depth than this, even all the way to the seventh level, and
it falls apart because of a difference of opinion, it can be devastating. “I
thought we had more than this. Walking away from this relationship because you
don’t agree with me means that I can’t be real with you. You don’t value me because of me, you value me simply when
I agreed with you.”
So let’s move this scenario from
the sidewalk to the sanctuary. You have a number of relationships within your
church that feel meaningful and then one day you begin to question some of the
church teachings. You probably get many clichéd responses – like “Well, that’s
where faith comes in – you just have to believe.” So you’ve just moved
backwards in the intimacy venue from opinion to cliché.
But your curiosity is not satisfied
and you begin to not only ask questions but take a stand that’s a bit different
from that of your peers. You also begin to realize that each time you brooch
the subject, someone is trying to tell you why you are wrong – they end their
words with you by saying, “I’ll pray for you.” Before long you decide that you
need to ‘take a break’ from church for a while and when you do, no one calls to
check on you or visit you. People aren’t returning your calls, you’re extremely
hurt and disillusioned – you thought they were your friends but you learned
they were only friends as long as you thought like they do.
If you are a pastor, you may have
experienced this at a denomination level rather than a church level. As a pastor,
one of the greatest gifts you can give your congregants is the ability to
tolerate sitting in the pews with a great diversity of view points. Many
pastors spin their wheels trying to ‘get everyone on the same page.’ If parents
did that with their children, the eldest children would be waiting forever for
the younger children to catch up to their current maturity, they would be fed
up with not being allowed to grow and would leave home.
Ahhh….but there’s the catch….can
you, as pastor, sit with a diversity of view points while people are working
their way through to an understanding of an issue that will make sense to them?
Could you possibly even facilitate the journey for them? What if they end up at
an understanding that doesn’t match yours? Can you stay in relationship with
someone who doesn’t see things exactly as you do? This may be the point of
intimacy that a church is functioning at. It’s a dangerous place because the
premise is that as long as we all agree, we will get along. Intimacy is built
on learning how to stay in relationship when there is stress.
No comments:
Post a Comment